Suppose that we use Joda Money in our project, and have an entity with property having type Money. There are already pretty nice type mapping implementations for Money, provided by Jadira - User Types project. All we have to do is just let Hibernate know that we want to use specific type mapping.
When you look at the Hibernate Docs, Section 18.104.22.168.1: Type, you'll see few possibilities, starting from the simplest - using @Type annotation on each property having Money type. This choice can be good if you have only one, or very few, properties of this type in your domain mapping. It is very probable that sooner or later, when your project will grow enough, there will be more and more of them, and you end up with many similar lines defining the same type mapping.
If you aren't a big fan of repeating yourself, or you don't trust in refactorings made by your apprentices ;), you should consider another way, using @TypeDefs and @TypeDef annotations.
As you may read in Hibernate documentation: "These annotations can be placed at the class or package level." - Let's focus on the second option - package level.
We will place these annotations in package-info.java for our domain entities holding package (see: Java Language Specification - 7.4.1. Named Packages). It will look like this:
Now, when you map the property using Money type, you can do it without additional type mapping specification, just like this:
One technical note, before you become happy Money mapping user ;) - Because PersistentMoneyAmount uses single column (holding amount) for Money mapping, it requires defining of currency which will be used along with the amount. The default currency can be defined as Persistence Unit property: jadira.usertype.currencyCode
PS. Don't treat the above Money example as the guideline of Joda Money mapping :), there are probably better ways of doing it, see Jadira User Types blog.
Few links for the dessert:
This article has been republished on Java Code Geeks (04/09/2013), and on Dzone's Javalobby (04/15/2013).